Publication

Under Construction – Summer 2018

Jul 09, 2018

Letter From the Editor

Welcome to the summer 2018 edition of our Under Construction newsletter. In this issue, to accompany the summer heat, we highlight several hot topic items affecting the construction industry. For example, delay and disruption issues can arise in any project. The first article introduces these issues and explains the legal requirements for both delay and disruption claims, and provides some practical ideas.

Next, we follow with a very recent decision by the National Labor Relations Board which held that two separate construction contractors constituted a single employer and a joint employer under pertinent labor law. We will be sure to keep an eye on how this decision plays out in the coming months. 

Our third article looks at some of the recent legislation proposed by the California Legislature in this first half of 2018 surrounding the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). A brief summary of some of the proposed CEQA amendments is included for your review. 

In recent years, a few law firms have made a cottage industry of enticing condominium home owners associations to sue the project developers over many issues, very often for alleged construction defects. Numerous homeowners’ associations have filed lawsuits against developers, contractors, and builders for purportedly defective work. The recent Utah Supreme Court ruling in Gables v. Castlewood-Sterling, 2018 UT 04, reiterates what many courts seem to have forgotten. Our fourth article reminds us that in Utah unless a plaintiff has contractual rights, or has been assigned such rights, it cannot maintain a cause of action when privity of contract is an essential element of a claim.

Finally, our fifth article reviews the recent case of United Riggers and Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron and Steel Company, and how the California Supreme Court addressed whether a direct contractor can withhold payment from a subcontractor based on the “good faith dispute” exception pursuant to the state’s prompt payment laws. Prompt payment laws exist in a number of jurisdictions and how courts address different aspects of prompt payment laws can provide valuable insights.

We hope you will find these articles informative and enlightening. Please let us know if you want us to address a specific construction issue in a future newsletter. Stay cool out there and have a safe and enjoyable summer!
Regards,
James J. Sienicki

[Read the full newsletter]

About Snell & Wilmer

Founded in 1938, Snell & Wilmer is a full-service business law firm with more than 500 attorneys practicing in 16 locations throughout the United States and in Mexico, including Los Angeles, Orange County and San Diego, California; Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; Denver, Colorado; Washington, D.C.; Boise, Idaho; Las Vegas and Reno, Nevada; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Portland, Oregon; Dallas, Texas; Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle, Washington; and Los Cabos, Mexico. The firm represents clients ranging from large, publicly traded corporations to small businesses, individuals and entrepreneurs. For more information, visit swlaw.com.

©2024 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. All rights reserved. The purpose of this publication is to provide readers with information on current topics of general interest and nothing herein shall be construed to create, offer, or memorialize the existence of an attorney-client relationship. The content should not be considered legal advice or opinion, because it may not apply to the specific facts of a particular matter. As guidance in areas is constantly changing and evolving, you should consider checking for updated guidance, or consult with legal counsel, before making any decisions.
Media Contact

Olivia Nguyen-Quang

Associate Director of Communications
media@swlaw.com 714.427.7490